- Journal Home
- Volume 41 - 2025
- Volume 40 - 2024
- Volume 39 - 2023
- Volume 38 - 2022
- Volume 37 - 2021
- Volume 36 - 2020
- Volume 35 - 2019
- Volume 34 - 2018
- Volume 33 - 2017
- Volume 32 - 2016
- Volume 31 - 2015
- Volume 30 - 2014
- Volume 29 - 2013
- Volume 28 - 2012
- Volume 27 - 2011
- Volume 26 - 2010
- Volume 25 - 2009
Cited by
- BibTex
- RIS
- TXT
In this note, we consider the following degenerate parabolic equation studied in [F. Chiarenza and R. Serapioni, Degenerate parabolic equations and
Harnack inequality, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 137 (1984)] i.e.,
where $f=(f^1,···,f^n)$ and $Ω$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with Lipschitz boundary, $n≥2$ and $T>0.$ In this paper, we apply Moser iteration argument to build
up the explicit relationship among the coefficients $a_{i,j}(x,t)$, $f$ and the maximum norm of the solution. Meanwhile, we also find that the weighed Lebesgue
space $L^{2l/(l−1)}$ to which $f$ belongs is essentially sharp in order to establish local
boundedness of the solution. Here the definition of $l$ is found in Lemma 2.3.
Our results cover the well-known results.
In this note, we consider the following degenerate parabolic equation studied in [F. Chiarenza and R. Serapioni, Degenerate parabolic equations and
Harnack inequality, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 137 (1984)] i.e.,
where $f=(f^1,···,f^n)$ and $Ω$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with Lipschitz boundary, $n≥2$ and $T>0.$ In this paper, we apply Moser iteration argument to build
up the explicit relationship among the coefficients $a_{i,j}(x,t)$, $f$ and the maximum norm of the solution. Meanwhile, we also find that the weighed Lebesgue
space $L^{2l/(l−1)}$ to which $f$ belongs is essentially sharp in order to establish local
boundedness of the solution. Here the definition of $l$ is found in Lemma 2.3.
Our results cover the well-known results.